🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest is no longer a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a privilege that authorities grant or deny as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine when and where demonstrations can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "serious and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental attacks on freedom have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by referring to last week's heinous anti-Jewish attack on a Manchester mosque. There should be universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this atrocity as a justification to stifle dissent is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at genocide, you likely can't establish limits at democracy," commented a prominent American author, whose words that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and direct action against racism and fascism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the rights of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In the current complex situation, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have prompted the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and approve the detention of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this attempt. Ministers have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can suggest that protests criticizing Israel's actions should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the limited value they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of discrimination in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous boundary by banning a specific activist group, a non-violent, anti-genocide direct action organization. Thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for carrying signs against mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the sitting leader characterized such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to control opposition. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and died to secure our freedoms. We may eventually regret how casually we allowed them to be eroded.